akaihyo: (Default)
[personal profile] akaihyo
So, the novel I am working on is set in an alternate 1800 in England. History diverges in the late 1500s.

Now, my characters are off to listen to some political speakers. Do I make them up from whole cloth, do I use thinly veiled versions of historical figures or actual historical figures themselves 'adjusted' to the changed history? What are you opinions, dear readers.

Date: 2005-11-06 11:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] st-rev.livejournal.com
Take historical figures and obscure them enough that they serve as easter eggs.

Date: 2005-11-06 11:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stefmccollum.livejournal.com
Done well, actual historical figures can work very well in an alternate-reality storyline. Neil Gaiman's latest comic series "1602" comes to mind, featuring an aging Queen Elizabeth. But st_rev's idea of making them harder to puzzle out is a good one, too.

Date: 2005-11-07 01:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weetanya.livejournal.com
i vote for actual figures adjusted to changed history !

Date: 2005-11-07 09:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kshandr.livejournal.com
I'd have said "keep away from the historical characters." The reason being that, as a reader, when someone introduces a character I'm aware of, I get antsy if the character is not done *right*. It's like a constant thorn in my side as I read. But then - I know you know the background material, so...

Date: 2005-11-07 05:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weetanya.livejournal.com
Depending upon how today's meeting goes, I might quit school to run an import shop. I'd pick a different town, of course, so as not to compete wichoo. But yes, if the professor continues to be an arse, I'm totally going to go for career 2.

=)

January 2015

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 06:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios